Sophinisba Solis (
sophinisba) wrote2007-03-31 11:58 pm
Entry tags:
But before I go...
I would like to say something about this week's Lost.
The thing I liked most about the first season of Lost was the tricks it would pull on us as viewers. My favorite example of this will always be the first Locke episode, "Walkabout". I love the way the reveal in the last scene changes the meaning of everything that we've seen before that. Part of my frustration with the last two seasons is that we haven't had enough of those surprises, so I am always excited when the writers seem to be remembering how cool the show used to be, even if they can't really pull it off the same way they used to.
I loved the little nods to that episode in last week's, "The Man from Tallahassee", in particular the first scene, when Locke's sitting at the interview with the woman from disability services, and the fact that he gets up at the end of the scene contradicts our assumptions watching it up till then. After I watched that I forced my friend S to watch "Walkabout" on my DVD so she could see how good this show can be.
I really liked the idea of this past week's episode. I was very bored at first (the scenes taking place in Australia) but I loved going back to scenes from earlier in the series and seeing them from a different point of view. I love the fact that our main characters have never paid much attention to Nikki and Paulo, and if they had things might have gone a lot differently – the hatch, the case, etc. I love that the first time through the scene where Nikki collapses I couldn't understand what she was saying, and the second time through, knowing everything that had happened before, it made sense. And if Sawyer and Hurley had been paying attention to what had happened before, they wouldn't have frickin' buried them alive.
On the other hand, meh. I like the idea of them bringing out characters that have been present but ignored up till now, but I wish they could have done something more interesting with them. Why should I care what happens with the diamonds? Why should I care about any of this?
(Charlie confessing to Sun was nice. We could use more of that kind of thing.)
The thing I liked most about the first season of Lost was the tricks it would pull on us as viewers. My favorite example of this will always be the first Locke episode, "Walkabout". I love the way the reveal in the last scene changes the meaning of everything that we've seen before that. Part of my frustration with the last two seasons is that we haven't had enough of those surprises, so I am always excited when the writers seem to be remembering how cool the show used to be, even if they can't really pull it off the same way they used to.
I loved the little nods to that episode in last week's, "The Man from Tallahassee", in particular the first scene, when Locke's sitting at the interview with the woman from disability services, and the fact that he gets up at the end of the scene contradicts our assumptions watching it up till then. After I watched that I forced my friend S to watch "Walkabout" on my DVD so she could see how good this show can be.
I really liked the idea of this past week's episode. I was very bored at first (the scenes taking place in Australia) but I loved going back to scenes from earlier in the series and seeing them from a different point of view. I love the fact that our main characters have never paid much attention to Nikki and Paulo, and if they had things might have gone a lot differently – the hatch, the case, etc. I love that the first time through the scene where Nikki collapses I couldn't understand what she was saying, and the second time through, knowing everything that had happened before, it made sense. And if Sawyer and Hurley had been paying attention to what had happened before, they wouldn't have frickin' buried them alive.
On the other hand, meh. I like the idea of them bringing out characters that have been present but ignored up till now, but I wish they could have done something more interesting with them. Why should I care what happens with the diamonds? Why should I care about any of this?
(Charlie confessing to Sun was nice. We could use more of that kind of thing.)

no subject
no subject
no subject
I just don't care about them enough to care that they got buried alive. I bet they don't die. Alas. :-)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
That was the best moment in the whole episode.
no subject
no subject
no subject
:(
no subject
no subject